Jentashapir Journal of Health Research

Published by: Neoscriber Demo Publisher

Bipolar versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP), Advantages and Disadvantages in a 6-Month Follow-Up

Esmaeil Mousapour 1 , Mohsen Sarkarian 1 , Pouria Mousapour 2 and Jahanbakhsh Rahimizadeh 1 , *
Authors Information
1 Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishpaour University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • Jentashapir Journal of Health Research: August 2018, 9 (4); e60396
  • Published Online: August 19, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: December 8, 2017
  • Revised: January 11, 2018
  • Accepted: August 12, 2018
  • DOI: 10.5812/jjhr.60396

To Cite: Mousapour E, Sarkarian M, Mousapour P, Rahimizadeh J. Bipolar versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP), Advantages and Disadvantages in a 6-Month Follow-Up, Jentashapir J Health Res. 2018 ; 9(4):e60396. doi: 10.5812/jjhr.60396.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, Jentashapir Journal of Health Research. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Dowd JB, Cockett AT, Peters PC, Proctor C. Transurethral prostatectomy: practice aspects of the dominant operation in American urology. J Urol. 1989;141(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40732-4. [PubMed: 2643720].
  • 2. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol. 1989;141(2):243-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)40731-2. [PubMed: 2643719].
  • 3. Kellow NH. Pacemaker failure during transurethral resection of the prostate. Anaesthesia. 1993;48(2):136-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb06852.x. [PubMed: 7681634].
  • 4. Giulianelli R, Albanesi L, Attisani F, Gentile BC, Vincenti G, Pisanti F, et al. Comparative randomized study on the efficaciousness of endoscopic bipolar prostate resection versus monopolar resection technique. 3 year follow-up. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013;85(2):86-91. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.2.86. [PubMed: 23820656].
  • 5. Ho HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol. 2007;52(2):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038. [PubMed: 17416453].
  • 6. Michielsen DP, Debacker T, De Boe V, Van Lersberghe C, Kaufman L, Braeckman JG, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline--an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction? J Urol. 2007;178(5):2035-9. discussion 2039. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.038. [PubMed: 17869297].
  • 7. Starkman JS, Santucci RA. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int. 2005;95(1):69-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05253.x. [PubMed: 15638897].
  • 8. Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, Zhou J, Peng YB, Wang Z. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2010;106(9):1339-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09401.x. [PubMed: 20477825].
  • 9. Komura K, Inamoto T, Takai T, Uchimoto T, Saito K, Tanda N, et al. Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: results from a randomised trial. BJU Int. 2015;115(4):644-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.12831. [PubMed: 24909399].
  • 10. Fagerstrom T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique: a single-centre randomized trial of 202 patients. BJU Int. 2010;105(11):1560-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09052.x. [PubMed: 19912211].
  • 11. Boyle P, Robertson C, Mazzetta C, Keech M, Hobbs R, Fourcade R, et al. The association between lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in four centres: the UrEpik study. BJU Int. 2003;92(7):719-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04459.x. [PubMed: 14616454].
  • 12. Akman T, Binbay M, Tekinarslan E, Tepeler A, Akcay M, Ozgor F, et al. Effects of bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate on urinary and erectile function: a prospective randomized comparative study. BJU Int. 2013;111(1):129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11266.x. [PubMed: 22672229].
  • 13. Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, Binbay M, Tas A, Altunrende F. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1339-43. [PubMed: 16145415].
  • 14. Mamoulakis C, Skolarikos A, Schulze M, Scoffone CM, Rassweiler JJ, Alivizatos G, et al. Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. BJU Int. 2012;109(2):240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x. [PubMed: 21557796].
  • 15. Rosen R, Altwein J, Boyle P, Kirby RS, Lukacs B, Meuleman E, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms and male sexual dysfunction: the multinational survey of the aging male (MSAM-7). Eur Urol. 2003;44(6):637-49. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.08.015. [PubMed: 14644114].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments