Jentashapir Journal of Health Research

Published by: Kowsar

The Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients of the Restorative Department of Babol Dental School

Faezeh Abolghasemzade 1 , Homayon Alaghehmand 2 and Reza Judi 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran
2 Dental Material Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran
Article information
  • Jentashapir Journal of Health Research: December 01, 2015, 6 (6); e25600
  • Published Online: December 14, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 25, 2014
  • Revised: April 3, 2015
  • Accepted: April 6, 2015
  • DOI: 10.17795/jjhr-25600

To Cite: Abolghasemzade F, Alaghehmand H, Judi R. The Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients of the Restorative Department of Babol Dental School, Jentashapir J Health Res. 2015 ; 6(6):e25600. doi: 10.17795/jjhr-25600.

Copyright © 2015, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2001; 5(3): 148-55[DOI]
  • 2. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000; 13(2): 101-4[PubMed]
  • 3. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138(6): 775-83[DOI]
  • 4. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000; 58(3): 97-101[DOI]
  • 5. Kolker JL, Damiano PC, Jones MP, Dawson DV, Caplan DJ, Armstrong SR, et al. The timing of subsequent treatment for teeth restored with large amalgams and crowns: factors related to the need for subsequent treatment. J Dent Res. 2004; 83(11): 854-8[PubMed]
  • 6. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): Variation by dentist factors. J Dent. 2005; 33(10): 827-35[DOI]
  • 7. Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Overton DA, Gordon M. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(8): 1127-32[DOI]
  • 8. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2): 63-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003; 31(6): 395-405[DOI]
  • 10. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005; 18(3): 198-211[PubMed]
  • 11. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 2013;
  • 12. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J. 2000; 50(6): 361-6[DOI]
  • 13. Kidd EA. Diagnosis of secondary caries. J Dent Educ. 2001; 65(10): 997-1000[PubMed]
  • 14. Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater. 2013; 29(1): 59-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Mjor IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(2): 117-23[PubMed]
  • 16. Mjor IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29(5): 313-7[PubMed]
  • 17. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(1): 2-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2000; 28(2): 111-6[DOI]
  • 19. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent. 2001; 29(5): 317-24[DOI]
  • 20. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent. 2001; 3(2): 185-94[PubMed]
  • 21. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent. 1999; 27(1): 13-9[DOI]
  • 22. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29(8): 483-90[PubMed]
  • 23. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent. 2004; 32(5): 379-83[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent. 2006; 34(7): 427-35[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments