Jentashapir Journal of Health Research

Published by: Kowsar

The Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients of the Restorative Department of Babol Dental School

Faezeh Abolghasemzade 1 , Homayon Alaghehmand 2 and Reza Judi 2 , *
Authors Information
1 Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran
2 Dental Material Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran
Article information
  • Jentashapir Journal of Health Research: December 01, 2015, 6 (6); e25600
  • Published Online: December 14, 2015
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: November 25, 2014
  • Revised: April 3, 2015
  • Accepted: April 6, 2015
  • DOI: 10.17795/jjhr-25600

To Cite: Abolghasemzade F, Alaghehmand H, Judi R. The Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients of the Restorative Department of Babol Dental School, Jentashapir J Health Res. 2015 ;6(6):e25600. doi: 10.17795/jjhr-25600.

Abstract
Copyright © 2015, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2001; 5(3): 148-55[DOI]
  • 2. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent. 2000; 13(2): 101-4[PubMed]
  • 3. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138(6): 775-83[DOI]
  • 4. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2000; 58(3): 97-101[DOI]
  • 5. Kolker JL, Damiano PC, Jones MP, Dawson DV, Caplan DJ, Armstrong SR, et al. The timing of subsequent treatment for teeth restored with large amalgams and crowns: factors related to the need for subsequent treatment. J Dent Res. 2004; 83(11): 854-8[PubMed]
  • 6. Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL, Burke FJT. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 3): Variation by dentist factors. J Dent. 2005; 33(10): 827-35[DOI]
  • 7. Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Overton DA, Gordon M. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(8): 1127-32[DOI]
  • 8. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003; 7(2): 63-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, D'Hoore W, Carvalho J, Qvist V. Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth. J Dent. 2003; 31(6): 395-405[DOI]
  • 10. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005; 18(3): 198-211[PubMed]
  • 11. Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 2013;
  • 12. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J. 2000; 50(6): 361-6[DOI]
  • 13. Kidd EA. Diagnosis of secondary caries. J Dent Educ. 2001; 65(10): 997-1000[PubMed]
  • 14. Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater. 2013; 29(1): 59-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Mjor IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(2): 117-23[PubMed]
  • 16. Mjor IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29(5): 313-7[PubMed]
  • 17. Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(1): 2-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Köhler B, Rasmusson CG, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent. 2000; 28(2): 111-6[DOI]
  • 19. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent. 2001; 29(5): 317-24[DOI]
  • 20. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent. 2001; 3(2): 185-94[PubMed]
  • 21. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent. 1999; 27(1): 13-9[DOI]
  • 22. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29(8): 483-90[PubMed]
  • 23. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent. 2004; 32(5): 379-83[DOI][PubMed]
  • 24. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. J Dent. 2006; 34(7): 427-35[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments