Jentashapir Journal of Health Research

Published by: Kowsar
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 8 (4)

A Comparison of Stress Distribution Around Dental Implants in Three Models of Arch Form to Replace Six Anterior Teeth of Maxilla using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Method

Mahmoud Jahangirnezhad 1 , Hojatollah Yousefimanesh 1 , Maryam Zarei 1 , * and Iman Ivaz 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Periodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IR Iran
2 School of Dental Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciense, Ahvaz, IR Iran
Article information
  • Jentashapir Journal of Health Research: , In Press (In Press); e12028
  • Published Online: August 31, 2017
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: April 24, 2017
  • Accepted: July 23, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/jjhr.12028

To Cite: Jahangirnezhad M, Yousefimanesh H, Zarei M, Ivaz I. A Comparison of Stress Distribution Around Dental Implants in Three Models of Arch Form to Replace Six Anterior Teeth of Maxilla using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Method, Jentashapir J Helath Res. Online ahead of Print ;In Press(In Press):e12028. doi: 10.5812/jjhr.12028.

Abstract
© 2017, Jentashapir Journal of Health Research. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
  • 1. Misch CE. Maxillary arch implant considerations: Fixed and overdenture prostheses. In: Misch C, editor. Contemporary Implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 2008. p. 367-71.
  • 2. Misch CE. Treatment planning for the edentulous posterior. In: Misch C, editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 2008. p. 389-418.
  • 3. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5(4).
  • 4. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387-416. [PubMed: 6809663].
  • 5. Misch CE. Maxillary arch implant considrations: Fixed and overdenture prostheses. In: Misch C, editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 2008. p. 374-7.
  • 6. Misch CE. Treatment plans for partially and completely edentulous arches in implant dentistry. In: Misch C, editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 2008. p. 406-18.
  • 7. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(3):210-6. discussion 216-8. [PubMed: 8308618].
  • 8. Wakabayashi N, Ona M, Suzuki T, Igarashi Y. Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. J Dent. 2008;36(7):463-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.010. [PubMed: 18455859].
  • 9. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(2):144-50. doi: 10.1016/S0022391303007418. [PubMed: 14970760].
  • 10. Gapski R, Wang HL, Mascarenhas P, Lang NP. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(5):515-27. [PubMed: 12969355].
  • 11. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol. 1997;23(3):104-11. [PubMed: 9477847].
  • 12. Vojdani M, Sabouri A, Jafari K, Khajehpour S, Farjoud E. Effect of Framework Material on Stress Distribution around Implants using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Shahid Beheshti Univ Dent J. 2013;30(4):233-9.
  • 13. Lewinstein I, Banks-Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10(3):355-66. [PubMed: 7615332].
  • 14. Bahuguna R, Anand B, Kumar D, Aeran H, Anand V, Gulati M. Evaluation of stress patterns in bone around dental implant for different abutment angulations under axial and oblique loading: A finite element analysis. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4(1):46-51. doi: 10.4103/0975-5950.117882. [PubMed: 24163552].
  • 15. Jafari K, Vojdani M, Mahdavi F, Heidary H. Finite element analysis of the effect of superstructure materials and loading angle on stress distribution around the implant. J Dent Biomaterials. 2014;1(2):57-62.
  • 16. Correa S, Ivancik J, Isaza JF, Naranjo M. Evaluation of the structural behavior of three and four implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations by finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(2):110-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2011.07.001. [PubMed: 22104623].
  • 17. Cochran DL. The scientific basis for and clinical experiences with Straumann implants including the ITI Dental Implant System: a consensus report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:33-58. [PubMed: 11168256].
  • 18. Baghai Naini R, Nokar S, Borghei SH. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone stress and strain distributionin All-on-4 design. J Dent Med. 2010;23(2):104-12.
  • 19. Mahshid M, Geramy A, Ejlali M, Sedaghat Monfared M, Rezvani Habib Abadi S. Effect of the number of implants on stress distribution of anterior implant-supported fixed prostheses combined with a removable partial denture: a finite element analysis. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(3):335-42. [PubMed: 25628669].
  • 20. Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent. 2013;41(3):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.008. [PubMed: 23160036].
  • 21. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical Loading of Brånemark Implants Affects Interfacial Bone Modeling and Remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(3).
  • 22. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76(6):633-40. [PubMed: 8957790].
  • 23. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(3):357-68. [PubMed: 12814310].
  • 24. Baumeister T, Avallone EA. Marks' standard handbook ofmechanical engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  • 25. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12(3):207-18. [PubMed: 11359477].
  • 26. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Stohler CS. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(3):361-4. [PubMed: 1507102].
  • 27. Ghanbarzadeh J, Sabooni MR, Keshavarz M. Finite Element Stress Analysis on the Effects of the Changes in Length of Pontic on the Stresses Carried from Pontic to Abutments. J Mashhad Dent School. 2007;31(3):231-8.
  • 28. Misch CE. Treatment plans related to key implantpositions and implant number. In: Misch C, editor. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby; 2008. p. 147-59.

Altmetric:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Comments